Re: voteing
Date: 30 May 2004 at 21:53
> hi when you go to a voteing station you do not have to give your name or number to the person at the door.
> only to the person at the table...
So there the audit trail begins...
It's no less an issue of auditing ballot papers there or in a postal vote. Electronic voting is a different story, of course.
> your name and address are in the same enverlope as your vote...
No, just my name and the name and address of my witness...
> as soon as its proved a waste of cash the better....
Initial trials with earlier elections suggest that it increases turnout. In which case, I suppor it. Also means I can vote in my own sweet time without having to get down to an allotted polling station at an allotted time...
> you know then they are giveing it to a postman not someone who will burn or dump it the first chance he/she gets dont say that does not happan have you been to the canal lately? loads of post down there...most of it opened too
I also saw on the bbc news website the case of a greeting card opened with a complaint that it contained no money signed by the postman...
As I said before, it's dman near impossible to influence a vote by opening post -- once it's opened, the vote is lost, so you can't swing it either way...
Messages In This Thread
-
voteing
iffit — 9 May 2004 at 11:14 -
Re: voteing
Troller — 9 May 2004 at 14:43 -
Re: voteing
iffit — 29 May 2004 at 23:23 -
Re: voteing
Troller — 30 May 2004 at 09:52 -
Re: voteing
iffit — 30 May 2004 at 21:08 -
Re: voteing
Troller — 30 May 2004 at 21:53 -
Re: voteing
iffit — 31 May 2004 at 16:13 -
Re: voteing
Neil — 9 May 2004 at 14:36 -
Re: voteing
decaff — 9 May 2004 at 14:44 -
Re: voteing
iffit — 9 May 2004 at 16:11 -
Re: voteing
decaff — 9 May 2004 at 16:21 -
Re: voteing
Neil — 10 May 2004 at 14:07 -
Re: voteing
Neil — 10 May 2004 at 14:33 -
Re: voteing
decaff — 10 May 2004 at 14:54